Kass v. Kass (1998)
نویسندگان
چکیده
In Maureen Kass v. Steven Kass (1998), the Court of Appeals of New York in Albany, New York, ruled that the state should generally consider consent forms signed by participants in an in vitro [4] fertilization [5] (IVF) program valid, binding, and enforceable in the event of a dispute. The court indicated that decisions regarding the handling of cryopreserved pre-zygotes, often called preembryos, contained within these consent forms should be upheld. Although Steven and Maureen Kass had signed IVF consent forms agreeing to donate unused preembryos to research, during their divorce Maureen argued for custody of the preembryos. The New York Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Steven Kass and concluded that the informed consent [6] forms signed by the former couple had clearly manifested the couple?s mutual intent to donate any preembryos to research in the event of a dispute.
منابع مشابه
Kass v. Kass [Brief] (1998)
In a case of first impression in the state of New York, the highest state court decided that a prior written agreement between progenitors of frozen embryos regarding the disposition of their ?pre-zygotes? in the event of divorce is binding. By copying the general result arrived at by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Davis v. Davis in 1992, the New York court magnified the weight of authority in ...
متن کاملKass v. Kass [Brief] (1998)
In a case of first impression in the state of New York, the highest state court decided that a prior written agreement between progenitors of frozen embryos regarding the disposition of their ?pre-zygotes? in the event of divorce is binding. By copying the general result arrived at by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Davis v. Davis in 1992, the New York court magnified the weight of authority in ...
متن کاملKass v. Kass [Brief] (1998)
In a case of first impression in the state of New York, the highest state court decided that a prior written agreement between progenitors of frozen embryos regarding the disposition of their ?pre-zygotes? in the event of divorce is binding. By copying the general result arrived at by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Davis v. Davis in 1992, the New York court magnified the weight of authority in ...
متن کاملKass v. Kass [Brief] (1998)
In a case of first impression in the state of New York, the highest state court decided that a prior written agreement between progenitors of frozen embryos regarding the disposition of their ?pre-zygotes? in the event of divorce is binding. By copying the general result arrived at by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Davis v. Davis in 1992, the New York court magnified the weight of authority in ...
متن کاملCHANGES IN THE NEURAL REPRESENTATION OF ODORANTS AFTER OLFACTORY DEPRIVATION IN THE ADULT MOUSE OLFACTORY BULB by MARLEY
...............................................................................................ii Acknowledgement...................................................................................iv Table of contents......................................................................................v List of figures.................................................................................
متن کامل